|
|
|
Pressure mounts to bridge the heart of the Sturgeon River By Brian Back POSTED: DECEMBER 4, 2009
The
forest industry wants to build a bridge through a park that protects the
heart of the Sturgeon River, a popular canoe route and one of the last
wild rivers in central Ontario.
It wants to do it by breaking the rules.
And it wants Ontario’s approval.
When? Now. |
|
Vermilion Forest Management Company proposed the bridge in 2007 when it began preparation for the new Sudbury Forest Management Plan, which governs logging on Crown land (outside of parks) in the Sudbury Forest, the west side of Temagami.
|
![]() |
|
This is not about
obtaining access. That can be gained without crossing the
river by using one of the Vermilion's two alternative east-side routes. It
is
about the cheapest access for Falconbridge-based Gervais.
Gervais, Vermilion estimates, can remove the timber at less
cost by trucking it over a new Sturgeon bridge to the new
west-side Gervais Road that connects to Capreol. A
large portion of the timber will be sold to Domtar, one of
Canada's largest forest-products companies.
The east-side alternatives connect through River Valley along older
roads that traverse more rugged terrain, and these would
require upgrades and repairs, Streets says. It would also take longer to
haul the timber out.
There is a quiet transformation in the bush that makes the bridge
so compelling, and profitable, to Gervais: gravel expressways.
Gervais Road is one. These are replacement roads for the
first generation of all-weather roads. They are built straighter,
wider, flatter and with better fill. They make the Lake Temagami Access Road look like a
beaver trail.
Unlike all-weather roads that have a life span closer to 10
years, these are permanent. The Gervais Road, the second
expressway in
the area, replaced the Portelance Road (between the Wanapitei and Sturgeon rivers)
two years ago.
Two parks officials, who declined to be named, deny rumours that Ontario Parks, a branch of the MNR, has rejected
the bridge. They say the parks and timber branches are still
in discussion over its merits. The big picture is under
deliberation: clearcuts within and road access into the virgin
Solace Wildlands, clearcuts on the east and west boundaries of
the Sturgeon River, clearcuts on the south boundary of Solace park,
and the expansion of the road network on the east side. Vermilion is in a corner. If it gets the forest plan approved as is – with the bridge – then it will still require an amendment to the park plan for the crossing, and that requires public input. If it doesn’t get the bridge it will have to do a major amendment to the forest plan to remove the bridge and add an alternative route, also with public input. These costly delays could have been avoided if the issue had been resolved in 2007 park plan. That failure has forced the company to do an end run around the forest plan. Street has gone to the director of Ontario Parks and given her his social, environmental and economic justifications for the bridge. It is a backhanded slap in the face of the management planning system that is the cornerstone upon which forestry is governed. Ironically, the system favours the industry by protecting its timber allocations.
He told the director that crossing the Sturgeon
River has the least environmental and recreational impact.
The alternative routes
will require that timber be trucked through another park, the
Obabika River Park. More fuel will be
burned. And more canoe routes will be crossed.
Amber Ellis of
Earthroots
disagrees. "The road through Obabika
already exists and all parks and canoe routes are
already crossed except the upper Yorston River. That
can be avoided by using Vermilion’s alternative on the west
side
of Yorston Lake.
Street is clear that he will pull political strings. “We can obviously go the Minister of Natural Resources if
need be,” he says.
The minister's decision will ultimately be guided by the new
parks act. It lays out criteria for construction of roads in parks: there
are no reasonable alternatives, lowest cost is not the sole or
overriding justification, and all reasonable measures are
taken to minimize environmental damage.
However, the act also states the “minister must be satisfied” with these measures.
Courts traditionally side with ministers when there is
discretion, as happened in the
Bob Lake Road (near
Sharp Rock Inlet) court ruling in 2003. But this time the discretion
gives the minister less wiggle room.
Earthroots not only opposes crossing the Sturgeon but opposes
cutting in the Solace Wildlands, one of the last virgin
wildernesses outside of a park in central Ontario.
“We
are looking at a legal challenge,” says Ellis. With Earthroots, Friends of Temagami and Northwatch opposing Vermilion, they remind the industry of Temagami's sour reputation. It's one of the most prohibitive areas to log. |
|
![]() |
|